Describe the recommendations of the Second Administrative Reforms Commission for the code of conduct.

Points to Remember:

• The Second Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) focused on improving the ethical conduct and accountability of civil servants.
• Their recommendations on the code of conduct aimed to enhance transparency, integrity, and efficiency in public administration.
• The ARC emphasized a holistic approach, encompassing both preventive and punitive measures.

Introduction:

The Second Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC), established in 2005, undertook a comprehensive review of India’s administrative system. A crucial aspect of its mandate was to strengthen the ethical framework governing civil servants. The ARC recognized that a robust code of conduct is vital for maintaining public trust and ensuring effective governance. Their recommendations went beyond mere rules, aiming to foster a culture of integrity and accountability within the bureaucracy. This response will detail the key recommendations of the ARC regarding the code of conduct for civil servants.

Body:

1. Strengthening the Existing Code:

The ARC didn’t advocate for a completely new code but rather a significant strengthening of the existing one. This involved clarifying ambiguous provisions, making them more comprehensive, and ensuring their effective implementation. The existing code often lacked clarity and specificity, leading to inconsistent interpretation and enforcement. The ARC recommended addressing these loopholes and making the code more user-friendly and easily understandable for all civil servants.

2. Emphasis on Transparency and Accountability:

A central theme of the ARC’s recommendations was enhancing transparency and accountability. This included stricter regulations on asset declaration, with greater scrutiny and verification mechanisms. The ARC also suggested strengthening the process of investigating complaints of misconduct, ensuring timely and impartial inquiries. They emphasized the need for independent oversight bodies to monitor adherence to the code of conduct.

3. Addressing Conflicts of Interest:

The ARC paid significant attention to the issue of conflicts of interest, a major challenge in public administration. They recommended clear guidelines on how to identify, manage, and resolve potential conflicts of interest. This included restrictions on post-retirement employment and stricter regulations on accepting gifts and favors. The aim was to prevent situations where personal interests could compromise professional judgment and impartiality.

4. Promoting Ethical Conduct through Training and Awareness:

The ARC recognized that a strong code of conduct is only effective if it’s understood and internalized by civil servants. They recommended comprehensive training programs on ethics and integrity, incorporating case studies and interactive sessions. Regular refresher courses and workshops were also suggested to keep civil servants updated on evolving ethical challenges. The focus was on fostering a culture of ethical conduct rather than simply enforcing rules.

5. Strengthening Disciplinary Procedures:

The ARC also addressed the need for effective disciplinary procedures to deal with violations of the code of conduct. They recommended streamlining the process, ensuring timely investigations, and providing for fair and transparent hearings. The aim was to deter misconduct while ensuring that disciplinary actions are proportionate and just. They also suggested strengthening the appellate mechanisms to ensure redressal of grievances.

Conclusion:

The Second Administrative Reforms Commission’s recommendations on the code of conduct for civil servants aimed at a fundamental shift in the culture of public administration. By focusing on transparency, accountability, conflict of interest management, ethical training, and robust disciplinary procedures, the ARC sought to create a more efficient, ethical, and trustworthy bureaucracy. The success of these recommendations hinges on their effective implementation and consistent monitoring. A holistic approach, combining preventive measures with strong enforcement mechanisms, is crucial for fostering a culture of integrity and public service. By upholding these principles, India can strengthen its democratic institutions and ensure good governance for the benefit of its citizens. This ultimately contributes to a more just and equitable society, reflecting the constitutional values of justice, liberty, equality, and fraternity.

APSC Notes brings Prelims and Mains programs for APSC Prelims and APSC Mains Exam preparation. Various Programs initiated by APSC Notes are as follows:-

• APSC Mains 2024 Tests and Notes Program
• APSC Prelims Exam 2020- Test Series and Notes Program
• Apsc Prelims and Mains 2024 Tests Series and Notes Program
• Apsc Detailed Complete Prelims Notes

For any doubt, Just leave us a Chat or Fill us a querry